Tired of slow, expensive cloud CI/CD - thinking of building a local alternative. Would you use it?

Hey folks,

I’m honestly fed up with most of the CI/CD solutions out there, especially the cloud-hosted ones. They’re expensive, slow, and downright annoying.

Here’s how I see it: - CI is supposed to solve the “it works on my machine but not on yours” problem. - CD just says, “tests passed, green light — deploy.”

That’s basically it. Yet to solve these two simple problems we’re stuck with GitLab/GitHub Actions in the cloud — and don’t even get me started on Jenkins. Setting that up is a nightmare.

My philosophy is simpler: - Everything runs locally. - The environment is isolated and reproducible, like running on a fresh machine. - It’s incredibly fast to prototype — no need to commit and then wait minutes just to see if it worked.

I know others have tried similar approaches, and maybe it’s not ideal for huge corporations, but for startups and mid-sized teams I think this could be a game-changer.

If this sounds useful, I’m planning to build and open-source it.

Questions for you: - Would this actually solve a pain point for you? - What’s the #1 thing that completely pisses you off about modern CI/CD?

⸻

Why I’m asking: I’m a Staff SRE tired of waiting on cloud CI pipelines for tiny changes. Before I sink weeks into this, I want to know if other devs feel the same pain.

Thanks for any feedback 🙏

submitted by /u/SandeepNagaraj
[link] [comments]

from Software Development - methodologies, techniques, and tools. Covering Agile, RUP, Waterfall + more! https://ift.tt/LkyIB3s false